It would probably run more smoothly, more efficiently and compensate for altitude more accurrately. WF
It would probably run more smoothly, more efficiently and compensate for altitude more accurrately. WF
available
you will have to go ''experimental''
http://www.silent-hektik.com/UL_912_1.htm
Jacques
80hp 912
2005 sw
Saw one of these at the French Blois airshow looked a very nice designed kit the only problem was at around £2500 plus fitting you would have to do a lot of hours to benefit from the fuel economy
Mike
Flying CTSW is just great 500 hrs + now 2100 hrs total
Yesterday is history. Tommorrow is a mystery. And today? Today is a gift that's why they call it the present.
Hi Mike
Economy would be only a small part of the equation. No more carb ice 'probability'. Less parts . Less ajustments needed. High altitude/mixture problems ..no more
and ...if you resell all the expensive parts removed..then It's not 'that' costly.
BMW removed the same Bing carbs for injection a long while ago on their motorcycles
The 'early' US drones using the 912 are fuel injected -
I saw some ''injection researching'' on a 912 some 13 years ago.. ..so... ah...maybe one day...
I have a customer installing this system =Rans S-7 w/ULS= I'm eager to see it run ..next summer
Last edited by beauciel; 03-05-2010 at 09:45 AM.
Jacques
80hp 912
2005 sw
You only have to hold your horses until 2012.
What happens in 2012?
Here are a couple other fuel injection options:
http://sdsefi.com/aircraft.html
http://www.extremeaircraftengines.com/
Mike Koerner