+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 27

Thread: Azimut270 back from around the world flight and available for any questions

  1. #11
    Tip Ruffner is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Marion Center, PA (PN36)
    Posts
    89

    Default

    Yannick,
    What separation did the two of you maintain from each other?

  2. #12
    Yannick B is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    20

    Default

    Hello Josjonkers,

    It is very particular to fly the aircraft 25% over max authorized takeoff weight and I don't recommend to try it ! The takeoff roll can be as long as 4'500 feet, climb out spped of 81 kts and a climb rate of only few hundreads feet per minutes giving a very shallow profile. The takeoff from Nagpur India and Amman Jordania were the most challenging. The only mechanical problem was a leaking fuel pump that we had to replace our other concern were more weather related.


    Quote Originally Posted by josjonkers View Post
    My question is related to how to take off and fly the CT over gross weight and the reduced performance.

    What was the hairiest take off in this configuration?

    Also did you ever have any mechanical issues in flight or any other concerns during the flights?

  3. #13
    Yannick B is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    20

    Default

    Hello Glenn,

    Thanks ! We still haven't finallized our statistics but my guess would be 230 hours x 21 LT/H = 4800 LT (1270 GAL). Oil consumption was very low and estimated at 0.1 LT per 10 hours (3.4 FL OZ/ 10 hours). We tried to keep visual contact all the way with few hundread feet vertical separation and we had a GPS based "radar and anticolision" device called FLARM to help visualize the position of the other aircraft. No more pics on the web site for the time but a book project is being studied.

    Quote Originally Posted by GlennM View Post
    Congratulations on your successful flight! I am happy your returned safely.

    My questions:

    How much fuel did you use in total? How much oil? Did you have to add any between oil changes? How far did the two planes stay apart on most flights? Some of the photos I saw were very good close-ups. Are you going to post more pictures of your trip on your website? Where is Switzerland? (Just kidding, I figured I would contribute to the stereotype that Americans don't know geography.)

    Thank you.

  4. #14
    Yannick B is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    20

    Default

    Hello Tip,

    We tried to maintain visual contact with each other and were rarely more than half a mile apart. one aircraft was leading the formation and we did change role on every flight.

    Quote Originally Posted by Tip Ruffner View Post
    Yannick,
    What separation did the two of you maintain from each other?

  5. #15
    josjonkers is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Calgary, Alberta
    Posts
    244

    Default

    Awesome.
    Thanks Yannick.

    ROTAX. That little engine that could (forgive me; a take on a North American kid's story about a train engine).

    I have now 900 hours on my ct (since 2006) and the compression is still 78/80.

    I am still amazed every time I fly about the performance this airplane gives for the hp, useful load, speed,fuel consumption and the resulting range.

    I followed your trip closely.

    Congratulations!

    Send me a note whenever you are in the Calgary area and we will do some moutain/glacier flying!!

    T

  6. #16
    GlennM is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Orlando, Florida
    Posts
    106

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Yannick B View Post
    Hello Glenn,

    Thanks ! We still haven't finallized our statistics but my guess would be 230 hours x 21 LT/H = 4800 LT (1270 GAL). Oil consumption was very low and estimated at 0.1 LT per 10 hours (3.4 FL OZ/ 10 hours). We tried to keep visual contact all the way with few hundread feet vertical separation and we had a GPS based "radar and anticolision" device called FLARM to help visualize the position of the other aircraft. No more pics on the web site for the time but a book project is being studied.
    Thank you for the information. I agree with Josjonkers, these Rotax engines are exceptional. I don't think you would have anywhere near the oil consumption of the Rotax on an aircooled engine, the clearances are too large! I know you probably have your own writing style and ideas about a book, but I enjoyed the style of The Big Show (Le Grand Cirque) by Pierre Clostermann. Just a thought.

  7. #17
    Yannick B is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    20

    Default

    Hello Mac,

    I guess I will feel like you too, this round the world flight has not only been an experience or another experience, it is part of me now ! I love mountain flying and after all those hours over the water it is now luxury to have ground and airports below my wings. The book will most probably come out next year.....


    Quote Originally Posted by ctcw View Post
    Yannick,
    Ten years ago, before I took up flying, I decided to finish my carreer on motorbikes with a trip down to Gibraltar and then through Morocco and on to west Africa. Still after all those years I am still 'haunted' in a nice way of all the experiences I had on that trip and I wonder how you will ever surpass the experience you had of your own
    trip. What's next and when is the book coming out? How does it feel to be flying the corridors of Switzerland compared with the unlimited visibility of an ocean. I find it strange coming back to Ireland after a flight to mainland Europe with all the blue skies and then have to limit my altitude to no more than 1500 feet for the rest of the year!
    Mac

  8. #18
    mkoerner is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Palos Verdes, CA
    Posts
    57

    Default

    Congratulations on your flight and thank you for sharing information about on this forum.
    Why not land at Ascension Island and cut the Atlantic crossing in half?
    Also, your flight trace shows some significant maneuvering in the mid-Atlantic when one would expect you to be set on your course. It certainly seemed too late for second thoughts. Were you maneuvering around weather?
    Mike Koerner

  9. #19
    ctcw is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    68

    Default

    Yannick,
    I'm curious to know why you abandoned your original intention of flying through Iran and over the north of the Middle East. As a result of your experience in getting out of Jordan would you recommend giving that part of the world a miss?
    Mac

  10. #20
    207WF is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Hermosa Beach, CA
    Posts
    331

    Default

    WHY did you choose the coarse prop pitch setting in favor of the wide open throttle=5500 rpm that we see recommended in these pages? WF

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34