administrator

Who owns the "engine" companies - stolen from DanJohnson!

Rate this Entry
by , 06-28-2010 at 10:43 PM (1499 Views)
LSA Powerplants and Ownership
June 28, 2010

A Rotax 912S is installed on a popular LSA (cowling removed).
Let's have a little quiz. Ready? Four powerplant brands serve the Light-Sport Aircraft industry (well, not including the engine developed by CubCrafters... that's another story). Click to see them all. Most LSA use either Rotax, Continental, Jabiru, or Lycoming, with the popularity of these engines in roughly that order. *** So, here's the quiz: Which one of these engine brands is not majority American owned? Stumped? Most of you probably guessed, "Well, only Continental and Lycoming are U.S.-owed engine companies. Buzz! Wrong. The answer: Only Jabiru remains majority owned by a non-American company. Sold successfully around the world and in the USA through Jabiru USA, this engine manufacturer is owned by Australians. All the others are majority U.S. owned. Yep, even Rotax. *** At a Sebring meeting of the SLSA Council, an EAA group composed of the larger Light-Sport producers, Rotax's Christian Mundigler made a presentation that opened my eyes. Following a Sun 'n Fun 2010 discussion with BRP Powertrain Director of Communications Roland Larouchelle to be sure I had my facts correct, I can confirm Rotax is 50% owned by Bain Capital, headquartered in Boston, Massachusetts. Another 35% remains owned by the Canadian Bombardier family, and the last 15% is held by the Caisse Quebec Deposit and Investment Fund, the largest pension fund in Canada. So, the largest share and the majority of Rotax ownership is American but the engines are still manufactured in a sprawling plant in Austria (photo).
Rotax Aircraft Engines are manufactured in part of this large facility in Austria.
*** Some folks still call Bombardier the owner/manufacturer of Rotax engines but that's also wrong. In December 2003, the company was reorganized and today Rotax Aircraft Engines is part of BRP Powertrain, with BRP standing for Bombardier Recreational Products. Besides the much beloved LSA powerplants (which hold an estimated 72% U.S. market share) BRP Powertrain also owns such celebrated brands as Sea-Doo, Ski-Doo/Lynx, Can-Am, and Evinrude/Johnson.
Tags: None Add / Edit Tags
Categories
Uncategorized

Comments

  1. danmayworm's Avatar
    • |
    • permalink
    Please see the response I received from AOPA regarding the sought after increase (by agriculture interests) of ethanol from 10% to 15% in hi-octane MOGAS. I have 325 hours on my CTLS and have only bought about 50 gallons of 100LL and that was on long cross country trips. The rest has been MOGAS at a savings of about $1.50 per gallon and many oil changes. For us, this is a worse scenario than taking the lead out of AVGAS.
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Hello
    Thank you for contacting AOPA. AOPA as well as other industries are against the increase of ethanol in fuel. Parts of the oil industry, automobile manufactures and a few environmental groups are not in support of this increase. Despite our objections and those of other lobbyist groups it appears this may go through.
    For current Mogas STC's no ethanol is allowed whether 5% or 10% so when using auto gas with an STC the fuel should be tested prior to use to verify ethanol is not present. As written in the Rotax service instruction these engines are approved to run on up to 10% ethanol but have not been approved for higher levels.



    Rotax Service Instruction
    http://www.rotax-aircraft-engines.co...kus/d04432.pdf

    Peterson STC, Mogas
    http://www.autofuelstc.com/autofuelstc/pa/Ethanol.html

    Best regards,

    Chris Prichett
    Aviation Technical Specialist
    Government Affairs –Pilot Information Center
    800-USA-AOPA

    --- Original Message Below ---
    With all the press I am reading regarding getting the lead out of 100LL I haven't seen anything regarding the proposal of mandatory increasing the level of ethanol from 10% to 15%.

    AOPA can not let that happen! A vast majority of LSAs flying now and many other low compression aircraft enginesֲ use MOGAS. Increasing the ethanol content would force them out of the readily available and inexpensive (compared to AVGAS) fuel they are now using.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34